DDQ TUE 2021-11-16
37. User Interface Elements¶
37.1. Agenda¶
General Announcements
Paper Presentations
Category |
Item |
Day |
Date |
Due |
---|---|---|---|---|
Note |
Project Work Day |
MON |
11-22 |
|
Note |
Project Work Day |
TUE |
11-23 |
|
Note |
Holiday: Thanksgiving - No Class |
THU |
11-25 |
|
Exams |
THU |
12-02 |
||
Note |
Last Day of Class |
MON |
12-06 |
|
Note |
Friday Class Schedule in Effect - No Class |
TUE |
12-07 |
|
Term Project |
MON |
12-13 |
11:55 PM |
- 1(1,2)
As explained in the Exams section of the syllabus, the final milestone of your term project (i.e., Milestone 4: Prototyping & Testing) serves as your final examination in this course. Exam 2 is, therefore, a regular exam; it is not the final exam. The final term project milestone is considered a, “take-home final exam.”
Read the abstracts for upcoming papers that will be presented. You can, of course, read the entirety of a paper, if interested, but you need to read the abstract before the paper is presented so that you can provide good feedback to the presenter. The full paper presentation schedule is available here and and upcoming paper presentations are listed near the bottom of this page.
37.2. Activity¶
37.2.1. Introduction¶
When designing your interface, try to be consistent and predictable in your choice of interface elements [RE: components]. Whether they are aware of it or not, users have become familiar with elements acting in a certain way [RE: conceptual model], so choosing to adopt those elements when appropriate will help with task completion, efficiency, and satisfaction [RE: usability].
37.2.2. Component Design¶
37.2.3. Breakout Groups¶
Important
RANDOMIZE: Please move around to different tables and form a random group for this activity. Each group will be assigned a number by the instructor.
Quickly introduce yourselves to each other, if you don’t already know each other.
Pick a group representative. This person will be responsible for posting your breakout group’s response on Piazza before breakout group work ends for this activity.
Help your group representative respond to the prompts below in a followup discussion to Piazza @100.
List the names of your breakout group members.
What component-related is assigned to your group based on the group number that you were assigned by your instructor and the table below?
#
Component Name
#
Component Name
1
Checkbox
9
Radio Button
2
Dropdown List
10
Button
3
Toggle
11
Text Field
4
Breadcrumb
12
Pagination
5
Carousel
13
Progress Bar
6
Tool Tip
14
Modal / Modal Window
7
Card
15
Menu
8
Tool Bar
16
Slider
Define your component. In addition to describing the component type; please indicate when it’s appropriate to use your group’s type of component. Be sure to include your sources.
Include representative screenshots of your component and its variants in different styles. If one stands out as a status quo, then note that.
From scratch, create a Figma prototype of your component, then add the prototype’s share link to your post. As you work, please note any online resources you use and include them below your prototype share link.
What challenges did your group face during the creation of your prototype?
Look at and reply to the posts that other groups made.
37.2.5. After Class¶
Before 11:55PM today, individually comment on the paper presentation followup discussions in Piazza @100.
Continue reading the Design and Practicum modules, and make sure you’re aware of current assignments and their due dates.
Read the abstracts for upcoming papers that will be presented. You can, of course, read the entirety of a paper, if interested, but you need to read the abstract before the paper is presented so that you can provide good feedback to the presenter. Here is the presentation schedule for Fall 2021.
Table 37.2 Fall 2021 Paper Presentation Schedule¶ Date
Presenter
Paper
MON 11-15
Yadav, Himani
Stefanie M. Faas, Johannes Kraus, Alexander Schoenhals, and Martin Baumann. 2021. Calibrating Pedestrians’ Trust in Automated Vehicles: Does an Intent Display in an External HMI Support Trust Calibration and Safe Crossing Behavior? Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 157, 1–17. DOI: 10.1145/3411764.3445738
MON 11-29
Churaman, Tanya
Wonjung Kim, Seungchul Lee, Seonghoon Kim, Sungbin Jo, Chungkuk Yoo, Inseok Hwang, Seungwoo Kang, and Junehwa Song. 2020. Dyadic Mirror: Everyday Second-person Live-view for Empathetic Reflection upon Parent-child Interaction. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. 4, 3, Article 86 (September 2020), 29 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3411815
MON 11-29
Akin, Nicky
Karan Ahuja, Deval Shah, Sujeath Pareddy, Franceska Xhakaj, Amy Ogan, Yuvraj Agarwal, and Chris Harrison. 2021. Classroom Digital Twins with Instrumentation-Free Gaze Tracking. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 484, 1–9. DOI: 10.1145/3411764.3445711
TUE 11-30
Harper, Daniel
Rebecca Currano, So Yeon Park, Dylan James Moore, Kent Lyons, and David Sirkin. 2021. Little Road Driving HUD: Heads-Up Display Complexity Influences Drivers’ Perceptions of Automated Vehicles. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 511, 1–15. DOI: 10.1145/3411764.3445575
TUE 11-30
Suarez, Mathew
Stephen Uzor and Per Ola Kristensson. 2021. An Exploration of Freehand Crossing Selection in Head-Mounted Augmented Reality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI). 28, 5, Article 33 (October 2021), 27 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3462546
MON 12-06
Hamill, Daniel
Ziang Xiao, Michelle X. Zhou, Q. Vera Liao, Gloria Mark, Changyan Chi, Wenxi Chen, and Huahai Yang. 2020. Tell Me About Yourself: Using an AI-Powered Chatbot to Conduct Conversational Surveys with Open-ended Questions. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI). 27, 3, Article 15 (June 2020), 37 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3381804
MON 12-06
Wang, Yulong
Jakob Peintner, Maikol Funk Drechsler, Fabio Reway, Georg Seifert, Werner Huber, and Andreas Riener. 2021. Mixed Reality Environment for Complex Scenario Testing. In Mensch und Computer 2021 (MuC ‘21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 605–608. DOI: 10.1145/3473856.3474034
Comments
Please keep the comments polite and constructive.